|
MY
PROGRAM IS ABOUT TO BE CUT !
Page 2.
-
DEBRIEF -
If
you do not know your function's added-value toward your company's
objectives then in today's lean and mean era much of your functional
service may well be slated for outsourcing.
This
is just as true for KM as it is for HR or IT or Customer Service.
Some of Karen's services have been perceived not to have added value
to her immediate manager thereby relegating her programs to "niceties"
not "necessities."
Why
should KM remain on senior management's agenda ? Can you give a
clear business case to me ?
The
guest consultants highlighted Karen's lack of business acumen. She
neither knew the drivers of her company's business nor demonstrated
to date how her services were producing even specific generic benefits.
The
number one error I saw Karen make is poor customer capital skills,
namely, toward her immediate manager. If she was business astute
she would have been serving the needs of all her customers
including the one who is footing the bill for expensive executive
leadership programs. That also means here immediate manager. She
obviously has never made the effort to understand his needs and
his ongoing pressing needs. And she obviously did not appreciate
his background, being non-academic, "hands-on" experiences.
That alone should have raised warning bells from the very start.
This proposed change should have come as no surprise to her....but
it did. She failed to be close to her customers !
The
report she gave him (therefore) I suggest missed the mark ! He wasn't
interested in the comparative value between internal versus external
learning programs....He wanted to know why we should have programs
in the first place ! After a couple of years together she
had obviously not helped him see SOME clear link between
professional development and improved financial performance. Amazing
isn't it... and we have all been there. We provide solutions to
'needs' that we think are there but have never really been present
!
"But
hang on...two things", retorts Karen. "One... there has
been very few studies world-wide to quantify the effect training
has on overall performance. That frustrates me. I haven't seen any.
Two ... what business drivers ? Our current senior management team
don't even know the critical success factors of our organisation
let alone communicate them to us !"
"On
the first point, Karen, what have you been reading ? There are some
major studies concluding the true worth of professional development
for companies that if you were on your toes you would have easily
discovered. For instance, the American Society of Training and Development's
extensive study... or the IPA's study in England. But I also agree
with Noel Tichy our guest consultant who said ROI on less tangibles
services will always be difficult...I agree. All the more
reason to work hard on your function's metrics ! You could have
regularly educated your manager(s) regarding different measurement
requirements to less tangible assets. But really that does not excuse
you from ignoring these studies or preventing you from introducing
valid people development metrics of your own. What about asking
every alumni members for quantifiable performance outcomes as a
direct result of their executive program... which would have added
immense weight to your argument ? Yes ?
But
your second point about lack of strategic direction is a
problem in many companies The CEO of SAP, William McDermott, recently
said that before he entered the role probably 90 % of managers and
staff could not clearly state the strategies of the company. Yes..
this one is largely out of your control although you could have
been more proactive in directing your managers to how your services
add to the bottom line. If management has only a generic 3-year
strategic plan then obviously they are not convicted on the paradigms
of critical success factors and core capabilities.You have no clear
directions to work from... so everyone works to their own plans
producing a disjointed organisation (which McDermott regretably
saw happening at SAP). Mmmmmm. What does your manager I wonder work
from ? Did you ever ask him ? Maybe that could have been your default
scoreboard to start with."
So
Karen needs to develop business acumen by acquiring better business
knowledge. Secondly, she needs to acquire better verbal communication
skills as part of business acumen. I am not sure whether she
has developed this either. Maybe because of her manager's laissez-faire
leadership style he never bothered to train Karen in good business
case presentations...or give her any strategic direction at all.
"Karen,
you may like to briefly listen in on how some CEO's have to present
to their customer groups ( hear examples
of business presentations from William McDermott of SAP technologies
and from Steve Jobs of Apple Computers).
The
guest consultants were also alluding to a possible third shortcoming
of Karen's. She may still not have Training/HRD acumen to
provide a powerful smorgasboard of learning experiences, a "One
Stop Shop" or an "Integrated Learning Suite" for
her diverse customers. She has been providing a black and white
version of executive development. She has not again kept pace with
newer learning methodologies thereby limiting customer choices for
both the learner and their manager.
Conclusion
This
is quite a uniqe case study hypothetical because all four guest
consultants came up with remarkably similar advice on a critical
issue of how to keep a company board's priority on potentially under-valued
company initiatives. In fact, KM may be even less tangible and measurable
than one-off training programs and therefore may more greatly under-valued.Tichy
goes further in that unless Karen is directly reporting to an executive
board member then her company initiative is not perceived as strategic
and thus a non-core activity and thus outsourcable. Will it be too
late this time for Karen to transform herself into a business manager
? Is it too late for some of today's KM practitioners ?
_______________________________________________________
1
| 2
Your
Response ?
|