Entered
16/09/03
STATE
OF THE KM UNION ADDRESS
BY PETER SENGE,
2003
Senge, P.(2003)
Taking Personal Change Seriously : The Impact
of Organisational Learning on Management Practice. Academy of
Management Executive.17:2 p47-51
World-renowned
business researcher,
Peter Senge,
reviews 25 years of organisational learning culture progress that
KM is founded on since the publication of Chris Argyris's and
Donald Schon's milestone
book, 'Organisational Learning.' How far have we
come ? Is KM the answer ? Senge is emphatic about his conclusion.
Conclusion
'We are at the beginning of a long
journey.'
Organisational Learning Trends
1.
Still poor learning cultures generally.
The
main reason is clear. There continues to be an opposing social
culture and corporate culture mindset. Argyris
and Schon's work was particularly arguing for a radical shift
in work ethic not just behaviour, and not just in a few
departments or business units but enterprise-wide. Additionally,
25 earth years is NOT nearly enough time for ANY multi-faceted
set of ideas to produce a corporate world mindshift. Senge explains..
'They
(the radical core ideas) imply a fundamental set of new personal
and interpersonal competencies that sit solidly in opposition
to widely shared cultural norms.'
Our social
and work culture conditions us to appear totally self-reliant
and strongly independent....
'As children, most of us learn in our families
how to avoid blame, to win and not lose in interpersonal conflicts,
and to maintain the appearance of being in control. Children
in school learn how to display behaviors that teachers judge
as competent, to get 'right' answers and avoid 'wrong' answers.
From the beginning of one's professional work career, all manner
of attention is devoted to extending this impression of competence....Bosses
fear that acknowledging their uncertainties will cause them
to lose credibility, just as subordinates fear admitting that
they are not in control of tasks for which they are accountable.'
Learning from
others acknowledges that YOU MAY APPEAR TO BE INCOMPETENT...
'To detect an error is to acknowledge incompetence.
Doing so publicly in a work setting is often seen as "career
limiting," discouragement enough, even if it wasn't also
personally threatening.'
'This is why most work cultures around the world
still today place a great deal of emphasis on face-saving and
denying error, rather than detecting and correcting it.'
A state
of denial and deliberate blindness. A chronic, pervasive,
intractable, generational work ethic problem diametrically
opposed to the powerful solution....Argyris has tried for 18 years
at Harvard Business School to inculcate the solution of productive
reasoning amongst his business students without much success !....
(Argyris) concluded that it was going to take
"a long, long time," powerful evidence for just
how radical learning how-to-learn can actually be.
2. First signs
of a culture shift has occurred.
Interest in
organisational learning has not abated. The 'learning mandate' is
more widespread and more powerful than ever before he purports.
3. KM practitioners
have re-discovered that human learning's product is changed behaviour,
not intellectual search libraries or even intellectual understanding.
'I find that a great many practitioners today
appreciate that learning is fundamentally about action.'
'One of the rude awakenings from the substantial
investments in "knowledge management" systems
was discovering that "lessons learned" data bases and
the like are of little inherent worth. Information, even
information about "lessons learned," is only useful
when it leads to new and more productive actions. While
this may seem obvious, confusion between what constitutes information
and what constitutes knowledge lay at the heart of many failed
knowledge management initiatives. If people had agreed that knowledge
is "the capacity for effective action," they would not
have confused the information in their data bases with knowledge,
nor would they continue to assume that better information will
lead to change. Conversely, even inaccurate and incomplete information
can be useful--it all depends on the context of application.'
4. Sustained
changed behaviour - true change - is PERSONAL. Real learning
always is personally challenging...'intimate and systemic.'
"I am prepared to learn and change myself"
5. Sustained
organisational change is PERSONAL. "Rolling out a program"
remains pure fantasy. Compliance to the new program always remains
unsatisfactory unless the staff see desired changes being modelled
by their leaders first. Leaders must be the examples of desired
change.
'This idea still has probably not yet penetrated into the mainstream.'
6. Personal
change requires not only high self-awareness levels but perseverance.
'I believe this growing recognition comes in large measure from
appreciating that the behaviors and assumptions of managers are
a part of the problem, that we do have embedded defenses against
seeing gaps in our own actions, and that confronting these problems
requires deep personal commitment.'
I think recognizing that real learning surfaces deep and pervasive
issues that are daunting is a refreshing sign of maturity.'
7. The majority really only learn in periodic crises. Senge concludes
this in his 25 years analysis of the market's response to Argyris
and Schon's premier work on organisational learning.
'There can be great needs to learn. But so long as people feel
that their conventional ways of handling their affairs can work,
they are not yet motivated to really break out of their habitual
ways of doing things. Consequently, learning of the sort that
Argyris and Schön advocate still largely occurs on the
margin. The real opportunities for methods like theirs will
come when such learning is no longer an option, something
I expect to see with increasing frequency in the future.'
Next...
1
| 2
|